Breaking: Massive Lawsuit Has Just Been Filed Against Nancy Pelosi & The January 6th Committee – Conservative Talk
Connect with us

News

Breaking: Massive Lawsuit Has Just Been Filed Against Nancy Pelosi & The January 6th Committee

Former White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the January 6 committee.

He filed a 43-page complaint to the U.S. District Court in Washington in December. He asked a judge to block the enforcement of the two subpoenas the committee issued for himself and his telecom provider Verizon. He said the subpoenas were “overly broad and unduly burdensome” and he said the panel “lacks lawful authority” to obtain such information.

“The select Committee acts absent any valid legislative power and threatens to violate longstanding principles of executive privilege and immunity that are of constitutional origin and dimension,” the suit filed by Meadows’ attorney George Terwilliger said.

“Mr. Meadows, a witness, has been put in the untenable position of choosing between conflicting privilege claims that are of constitutional origin and dimension and having to either risk enforcement of the subpoena issued to him, not merely by the House of Represenatives, but through actions by the Executive and Judicial Branches, or, alternatively, unilaterally abandoning the former president’s claims of privileges and immunities,” the suit read.

The January 6 Committee responded, “Mr. Meadows’s flawed lawsuit won’t succeed at slowing down the Select Committee’s investigation or stopping us from getting the information we’re seeking. The Seelct Committee will meet next week to advance a report recommending that the House cute Mr. Meadows for contempt of Congress and refer him to the Department of Justice for prosecution.”

NPR reported:

Meadows was one of the first Trump administration officials to be subpoenaed back in late September, though his deposition was delayed as he engaged with the committee.

His lawyer cited concerns about executive privilege, which former President Donald Trump and his associates say should protect them from disclosing confidential communications–even though President Biden waived executive privilege claims in Meadows’ case.

Trump sued the committee in October to block the National Archives from releasing presidential records related to Jan. 6, and the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. Circuit ruled against him on Thursday.

According to Politico:

In his lawsuit, Meadows also levels a procedural complaint against the committee, noting that Pelosi rejected the appointment of two GOP members selected by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy to serve on the panel. After Pelosi’s decision, McCarthy pulled his remaining appointees from the committee, leaving Pelosi’s picks as the only remaining members. Pelosi appointed two Republicans, Reps. Liz Cheney or Wyoming and Kinzinger, to the panel.

Meadows contends that McCarthy’s decision to withdraw his remaining picks left the panel without a ranking Republican appointee. Yet the committee’s subpoena authority requires that the ranking members be consulted on subpoena decisions.

The ordering of Mr. Meadows’ deposition runs afoul of the Select Committee’s authorizing resolution, making it invalid and unenforceable,” Meadows contends.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

News

‘There Has To Be An Investigation’: Rand Paul Strikes Fear In AG Garland Following His Admission That He Approved Mar-A-Lago Raid

Disclaimer: This article may contain the viewpoint and opinion of the author.

In the early morning of Monday, August 8th, agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation executed a search warrant at the former President’s Mar a Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida. It was an unprecedented action by the United States Justice Department.

The FBI raid on Trump’s Mar a Largo home is politically motivated. The actual warrant was signed three days before on the 5th which means there was no exigent threat to destroy any evidence. Based on that alone, a simple subpoena would have been appropriate. 

Representative Marjorie Taylor Green, from Georgia, has become a controversial member of Congress since being elected in 2020 and sworn in in 2021. MTG, as she is known, is now setting her sights on Attorney General Merrick Garland. 

She announced that she filed articles of impeachment against Attorney General Merrick Garland a day after the Justice Department’s top official announced he personally approved the FBI raid on the Florida home of former President Donald Trump.


Officially, MTG is charging Garland with politicizing the Justice Department, and the other claims the attorney general has failed to uphold his oath of office and lost the trust of U.S. citizens to “execute the laws of the United States without partisan bias.”

“Merrick Garland has weaponized the DOJ and unleashed the FBI to target, harass, and persecute Joe Biden’s political enemies,” Mrs. Greene said. “The unprecedented raid on President Trump’s home is the type of tyrannical action that happens just before a country falls into a violent dictatorship.”

Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, agrees with Green. He demanded an investigation Wednesday into the Department of Justice and the FBI over the raid on President Trump’s Florida home. 

On “Fox & Friends,” Paul argued Attorney General Merrick Garland could face impeachment if an investigation finds him guilty of misusing his office. Paul made the statement two days before Green filed the Articles of Impeachment. 

Of course, the mainstream media has rushed to Garland’s defense and is stating Paul is calling for impeachment with no evidence Garland misused his office. Steve Benen of the Maddow Blog came to Garland’s defense on Thursday. 

Paul hasn’t presented any evidence of the attorney general misusing his office for political purposes or going after a political opponent, apparently because no such evidence exists. If they had no legitimate evidence of wrongdoing, it almost certainly couldn’t have received a court-ordered search warrant.

Paul did say that an investigation would probably not occur until after the mid-term election. The Democrats currently control Congress and any impeachment attempt would certainly fail to garner the required number of votes. 

Green, however, didn’t want to wait until November to take Garland, the DOJ, and the FBI on. She knows the votes will not happen. Nobody will cross party lines and agree to impeach the embattled Attorney general. 

However, she is sending a clear shot across the Democrat’s bow. Everything is indicating an overwhelming Republican victory in the November mid-terms. Unless strange things occur during the elections, Republicans will emerge in control of at least the House of Representatives. 

If things play out the way they should, Garland will be on the chopping block. He will most likely resign at that point to ensure his legacy isn’t one of impeachment. His image though will forever be tarnished as the man who ordered an early dawn raid on a former President to obtain paperwork. 

Continue Reading

News

Breaking: Arizona County Passes Resolution Rejecting The 2020 Election Results, “We Reject The Certified Results Of…”

The Maricopa County Republican Committee Executive Board has voted this past Tuesday to approve a proposed resolution that rejects the certification of the 2020 presidential election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden in a unanimous vote.

The Republicans in this Arizona county passed a similar resolution as the one approved by the GOP in Texas, who last week approved a resolution calling Joe Biden ‘illegitimate’ (read more about that here). This move is now putting pressure on the Arizona state GOP to pass a resolution, followed by the GOP state legislature to take the necessary actions to decertify the 2020 election for the state as a whole.

This resolution was drafted by Brian Ference, a member of the board as member at large, who was motivated by the recent documentary ‘2000 Mules’; this documentary showed just how vulnerable our elections have become to ballot trafficking and fraud. Ference told ‘The Arizona Sun Times’, “It’s clearer than ever that Joe Biden and his regime should not have won.”

The resolution stated the 2020 election “violated Article 1 and 2 of the U.S. Constitution, that various secretaries of state illegally circumvented their state legislatures in conducting their elections in multiple incorrect ways, including allowing ballots to be received after November 3, 2020.”

The resolution went on to say “acting president Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was not legitimately elected by the people of the United States” and “substantial election fraud in key metropolitan areas significantly affected the results in five key states in favor of Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.”

The resolution added, “The 2000 Mules documentary irrefutably proves election fraud occurred in Maricopa County during the 2020 Election in the form of ballot trafficking through drop boxes.”

The resolution ended by stating, “We reject the certified results of the 2020 Presidential election, and we hold that acting President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was not legitimately elected by the people of the United States. We strongly urge all Republicans to work to ensure election integrity and correct all fraud and weaknesses identified in the 2020 Election.”

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: ‘Putting People Behind Bars’ After Text Messages Were Doctored In The January 6th Committee, Adam Schiff Is Facing Calls To Be Removed From Office

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) appears to have doctored material that he presented in Monday evening’s hearing before the January 6 committee, exactly as Schiff did notoriously during President Donald Trump’s impeachment probe in 2019.

The committee was debating whether to hold former White House head of staff Mark Meadows in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over documents over which Trump claimed executive privilege. On Tuesday, the full House voted to hold Meadows in contempt and recommend him to the Department of Justice for prosecution.

According to The Federalist, Schiff doctored text messages he gave to the committee, changing the language and giving the misleading impression in a visual presentation that he was quoting real text messages rather than fabrications.

According to Sean Davis, during a hearing on the riot at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Schiff not only misrepresented the content of the text message and its source, but he also doctored actual text messages, which The Federalists received and studied in their full. One letter was doctored to read: “On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he considers are unlawful as no electoral votes at all.” He used the communication as justification for forcing Meadows to testify and holding him in contempt.

However, the initial communication came from former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz, who wrote detailed legal arguments that were given to Meadows by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH). And Schiff omitted the entire exchange, which read (emphasis added): On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should declare all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with founding father Alexander Hamilton’s guidance and judicial precedent.

‘No legislative act can be legal that is contradictory to the Constitution,’ stated Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78. In Hubbard v. Lowe, the court stated, ‘That an invalid statute is not a law at all is a premise no longer open to debate.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), denied the appeal, 242 U.S. 654 (1916). An unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally passed legislation, is no elector at all, according to this logic.

Schiff left out the parts in bold above that related to a legal basis for rejecting voters. As Davis noted, Schiff removed the final two paragraphs and the final phase of the first paragraph of the text message in his statement and on-screen graphic before introducing punctuation that was never there, all without indicating what he was doing. Schiff’s image, which was doctored to seem like an identical screenshot, was similarly doctored in that it included text that was never in the original message and removed content that was.

Schiff has routinely fabricated evidence in the course of investigations. He staged a dialogue between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during the opening hearing of the House Intelligence Committee’s inquiry against President Trump in 2019. When confronted, Schiff attempted to argue that he was only doing a “parody,” rather than generating a misleading public impression.

Later, during testimony before the Senate in Trump’s impeachment trial, Schiff impersonated a Trump comment to Zelenskyy once again. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a fellow January 6 committee member, similarly fabricated evidence against Trump when he mentioned the Charlottesville “very good people” deception in Trump’s second impeachment hearing. Trump’s defense then shattered the deception.

Consider Schiff’s struggles with stating the truth. First, he claims to have “more than circumstantial proof” of Russian collaboration with then-President Donald Trump. He didn’t generate any of it.

Then, Schiff’s reading of a claimed phone transcript of a phone discussion between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was revealed to be utterly false. Then there was Schiff’s phony assertion about communication with Trump’s second impeachment trial whistleblower.

Schiff has a lengthy history of spreading misinformation and has never faced any consequences. Schiff’s complaints about misinformation are simply more misinformation from the California lawmaker.

And, while he won’t say it, his major concern is that Twitter will no longer suppress opposing viewpoints. He is irritated that the flow of information will now contain opposing viewpoints. That is the sole reason Schiff and practically every other liberal Democrat oppose Musk’s purchase of Twitter.

Continue Reading

News

BYE BYE WHOOPI – “She’s gone for a while…”, ‘The View’ Cohost Whoopi Goldberg has Been Announced That she Won’t be Returning Anytime Soon

It has been reported by The View’s fellow Co-Host Joy Behar that Whoopi Goldberg will not be returning to The View yet due to other projects; Whoopi Goldberg was originally suspended for her racist remarks regarding The Holocaust.

Joy Behar has stated, “If you’re wondering where Whoopi is, the girl’s got a movie she’s making and she will be back when she finishes whatever she’s doing… so she’s gone for a while”.

According to NY 4, “what Goldberg is actually doing is filming the new Prime Video limited series “Anansi Boys” in Scotland. Based on the fantasy novel by Neil Gaiman, Whoopi will play Bird Woman, the villain of the story, who is seeking revenge on Anansi, played by Delroy Lindo. The series also stars Fiona Shaw, CCH Pounder and L. Scott Caldwell”.

NY 4 also stated that “since she’s [Whoopi] been gone, conservative political commentator Alyssa Farah Griffin has been keeping her seat warm. Griffin worked as the White House Director of Strategic Communications and Assistant to the President in the Trump administration in 2020. Griffin filled in for Goldberg on April 11 and 12, and has been announced as her replacement for the April 13 episode. It’s unclear whether she will continue to fill in for Goldberg while she films.

Goldberg’s break comes just over two months after she was suspended from the show on Feb. 1. The suspension came as a result of Goldberg saying that the Holocaust was “not about race” during a discussion about a Tennessee school board’s decision to remove graphic novel “Maus” from the curriculum.” ~ NY 4.

According to ‘The View’, Whoopi will not be back until at least May 2nd.

Continue Reading

News

DOJ ‘Has Reached An Intolerable State Of Weaponized Politicization’ McCarthy Vows To Investigate FBI Raid On Trump’s Home

Disclaimer: This article may contain the personal views and opinions of the author.

It is hard to know where to place Kevin McCarthy. He seems to be your typical politician. He will fight when it is beneficial for his political career.

Back in May of 2021, the New York Times reported:

“…on Wednesday that members of his party recognized that President Biden had been legitimately elected, four months after he and 146 other Republicans voted to overturn the election results.
“I don’t think anybody is questioning the legitimacy of the presidential election,” Mr. McCarthy told reporters after meeting with Mr. Biden and congressional leaders at the White House to discuss infrastructure spending. “I think that is all over with. We’re sitting here with the president today. So from that point of view, I don’t think that’s a problem.”

McCarthy did fight for the election’s legitimacy but then cowered like a dog with his tail between his legs. He acknowledges Biden as legitimate and says he will work with the Former Vice President.

It is reminiscent of the laughable government shutdown attempt by Former Speaker John Boehner during Obama’s presidency. In comparison, it could be said that the two were playing the game and that they were choosing their battles.

Both fought and lost, and it was time to retreat so they could fight again. However, both McCarthy and Boehner are hard to place. Are they RINOS, or are they true conservatives? Are they politicians, or are they ordinary people who make mistakes?

The Daily Mail UK reported:

“John Boehner revealed that he voted for Donald Trump in 2020 despite his aid claiming at the time of the election the former speaker would rather ‘set himself on fire’ than get involved in the election.”

Referring to Boehner’s book, “On the House: A Washington Memoir,” he also blamed Trump for January 6th and called it a “bloody insurrection.” He accused Trump of inciting violence and all that leftist propaganda. That Biden won because he is a “nice guy.”

Mitch McConnell, a well-known RINO, dodged questions regarding the raid. He later released a statement the day after the raid.

“The country deserves a thorough and immediate explanation of what led to the events of Monday. Attorney General Garland and the Department of Justice should already have provided answers to the American people and must do so immediately.”

It was vague as expected. He called out the DOJ and Garland but didn’t specifically mention the Mar-a-Lago raid. McCarthy does a little better but is also ambiguous in his response. The only difference is that McCarthy takes a step further by stating that Republicans will investigate the DOJ.

Truth tent reported McCarthy’s response:

“I’ve seen enough. The Department of Justice has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicization.

When Republicans take back the House, we will conduct immediate oversight of this department, follow the facts, and leave no stone unturned. Attorney General Garland, preserve your documents and clear your calendar.”

Rand Paul and Marjorie Taylor Green were precise in their response to the raid.

In a previous Raging Patriots article, Greene stated she was looking for a strong candidate for Speaker of the House when the Republicans regain control.

“I want a speaker that’s going to put America first, all of your money first, our borders and our children’s future above everything. That’s the future Speaker of the House.”

A house divided can not stand, but it would be nice if these politicians were straight talkers. That is why Trump has a huge following. Of course, he lies by overselling certain points, but he says what is on his mind. None of the roundabout answers, regardless if the politician is Greene or McCarthy.

I always had this personal saying about politics: “I trust my government to be untrustworthy.”

I never liked the new-aged idea of “I can have a beer with him” when considering a politician for a job. If people like Greene want to stand out, she should come out and say:

“I want Trump to be Speaker of the House.”

Kevin McCarthy should make his position clear. He should say:

“The raid at Mar-a-Lago was the last straw. The FBI withheld evidence on Kyle Rittenhouse’s case. The FBI’s invovlement on inciting Governor Whitmer’s kidnapping and the fact that they almost botched Larry Nassar’s sex abuse case by ignoring the tips from his victims. The FBI even has pedophiles under their employment. We will dismantle the FBI to the point where they are nothing more than rubble.”

Republicans have this “it’s his turn” way about them. We were stuck with John McCain in 2008 and Mit Romney in 2012. The same goes for the Speaker of the House. Kevin McCarthy is making vague announcements because he wants to be the Speaker of the House.

In Republican fashion, he would be nominated if Republicans win back the House. Only time will tell if people like Marjorie Taylor Greene are brave enough to go against the grain.

Continue Reading

News

“Gotta Get A 2nd Mortgage…” Kid Rock Continues On His Rampage And Obliterates Bruce Springsteen After Fans Complain About Bruce’s Insane Ticket Price

Disclaimer: This article may contain the personal views and opinions of the author.

There have been a number of surprising and interesting bedfellows that Conservatives and Libertarians have shared lately. Salient among them are lifelong Liberal, Bill Maher. Mr. Maher never quite seems happier (or frankly, funnier) than when he is going after the cancel culture or criticizing the narcissistic forms in which fanatical transgender activism often takes. Now, Kid Rock, of all people, seems to be evolving more and more into something like a conservative icon. Honestly, any enemy of Joy Behar’s is a friend of mine.

A tidal wave of outrage has recently washed over aging rocker Bruce Springsteen. The outrage reaches still further, to Ticketmaster. Thanks to Ticketmaster’s “dynamic pricing program”, tickets jumped up to a staggering $4,000. Fans are not happy and they’re sounding off on social media.

It is being reported that one said, “Gotta get a 2nd mortgage to get a ticket.” Another said: “Waiting for the quote on selling my kidney to get nosebleed seats.”

According to KHOU: “Ticket broker Kayla Ramsey with Midtown Premium Tickets said primary sellers like Ticketmaster and AXS are now doing exactly what ticket brokers do. 

“Many of these tickets are being priced on the primary market the same way scalpers price it on the secondary market, based on supply and demand,” said John Breyault, Vice President, Public Policy, Telecommunications, and Fraud for the National Consumers League.

“That means prices can change from minute to minute. 

“Shoppers reported selecting $250 tickets only to see them climb to $700 by the time they checked out. Some tickets got up to $4,000 to $5,000,” KHOU reported.

Kid Rock on the other hand, took the chance to showcase is skills of opportunism in conjunction with his business skills:

“My tickets are cheap. That’s right.” “I don’t want to break you by coming to see me.”

“I want to make as much money as I can, but I don’t need to drive around in a tinted down Rolls-Royce or Maybach and hide from people because I felt like I ripped them off.”

“If you give people a fair price, I think they’ll feel better about spending their money.”  “They might spend just as much because they don’t feel like someone is trying to get one over on them.”

Kid Rock had more to say regarding the reservations of the first two rows.

“They are not for sale,” Kid Rock said.  “I’m tired of seeing the old rich guy in the front row with the hot girlfriend.”

“And the hot girlfriend, you know, with her boobs hanging out, with her beer in the air, just screaming the whole time.” 

“The old rich guy is standing there like he couldn’t care less.”

“It’s a very common theme at Kid Rock concerts,” he said.

Kid Rock certainly seems to know what the best step is. He is trolling all of the right people. He has had a special place in this writer’s heart since, back in 2019, when he went off on alleged comedian Joy Behar. While I can’t say I endorse what he said, I do, perhaps idiosyncratically, endorse whom he said it to.

Regardless, Kid Rock does indeed seem to be on a roll in terms of being embraced by a whole new generation of fans. Donald Trump even seems to be a fan. Why else would he have introduced Kid Rock as “one of the greatest entertainers”. It was during the Bad Reputation tour that Donald Trump was introduced over the loudspeaker as a special guest.

That video which can found here, features the former President saying, “Hello everyone, I love you all, I know you’re having a great time at the Kid Rock concert tonight, quite frankly he’s amazing,” Trump said. “All of you in attendance are the true backbone of our country. Hardworking, God-fearing, Rock N’ Roll patriots”.

Continue Reading

News

“Number One, It Was All Declassified”: Donald Trump Goes Scorched Earth On FBI, Says ‘All They Had To Do Was Ask’

Disclaimer: This article may contain the viewpoint and opinion of the author.

There is a classification system for national security documents. In case you have not heard. It is to protect documents from people who do not have the proper clearances from reading the papers and potentially gaining knowledge they should not have. 

It is probably the most misused process in the government and that speaks volumes considering the United States government is infamous for misusing everything. The red tape in Washington D.C. amounts to a Mount Everest of paperwork and documentation. 

Any document can be tagged as classified. An email sent on the State Department’s classified email system is immediately tagged with being classified. It is categorized as confidential, secret, or top-secret. 

If you are in the middle of work and it’s a busy day, but you just remembered Katie’s birthday who works in accounting. You don’t have time to jump on another computer system. You shoot Katie an email wishing her a glorious happy birthday. Well, that email is now classified. 

There are thousands upon thousands of useless documents falling under the classified category. When the FBI’s search warrant details classified documents, keep in mind, that Trump’s grocery list could be in there. 

The process of declassifying documents is rather complicated. President Obama issued Executive Order 13526 detailing a step-by-step procedure to declassify documents. 

However, Obama did have the foresight to keep the President and Vice-President from following those rules. He explicitly exempted the sitting Commander-in-chief and vice president from having to follow those procedures.

Obama’s order means the President and Vice-President can declassify any document at any time without going through the proper procedures. President Trump can speak the magic words and bam, the document is no longer classified. 

On Monday, August 8th, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents executed a search warrant at the former President’s Mar a Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida. They were looking for classified documents. 

They did not hear the President speak the magic words when he packed up and left the White House in 2021. Making the raid even stranger is the fact that President Trump stated to reporters saying “ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS ASK.”

The Federal Agents were looking for documents the President took with him when he left the White House. Documents the President can deem declassified any time he wants. On Friday evening, Trump’s office stated Justthenews.com regarding classified documents. 

“He had a standing order that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken into the residence were deemed to be declassified,” his office stated. Is it surprising to hear the President had to take documents out of the Oval Office to continue working through the night? 

The Department of Justice has released the evidence receipt of the incursion into President Trump’s residence. The list includes vague terms such as leather-bound books of documents. The list is vague on purpose because it wasn’t about the documents. 

It is a fishing attempt to find anything related to the events of January 6th, 2021. Biden’s FBI and DOJ are desperate to find anything that keeps Trump off the Ballot in 2024. If it was legitimate, they wouldn’t have waited three days to execute the warrant.

The political attack dogs of the Democrat party are getting more and more confident they can do what they want. They may have made a grave mistake here and awoken the sleeping giant. 

Continue Reading

News

‘F*ck The FBI” & “Trump 2024 MAGA” Signs Placed All Around Los Angeles By Street Artist Sabo Hangs In Hilarious Trolling Against The Left

Disclaimer: This article may contain the personal views and opinions of the author.

Hatred against Trump supporters is certainly nothing new. Back in 2019, it was reported that there were well over 300 documented instances of hate crimes against Trump supporters.

March of that year, there was a worker on a school bus who ripped a MAGA hat off the head of a child. A month prior, it was further reported that a man pulled a gun on a couple who were wearing a Trump hat.

In 2018 there was a case where a truck that committed the unforgivable sin of having a “Trump 2020” bumper sticker was unceremoniously set on fire. Believe me, I could go on. But, this seems to be what is inexplicably known by the left as tolerance.

It is now being reported that:

The Los Angeles street artist known as Sabo has struck once again, hanging a series of signs around the city that read “Fuck the FBI” and “Trump 2024 MAGA.”

Sabo told Breitbart News that five signs were hung all together, including two in Brentwood — with one near The Coral tree Cafe — and one in front of The Pacific Design Center in West Hollywood.

Two were hung at the intersection Robertson and Melrose Aves. but were removed quickly, the artist said.

The signs appeared just days after the FBI raided former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. The FBI ransacked significant portions of the estate, including safes and even Melania Trump’s wardrobe.

The raid comes as Trump weighs whether or not he will run again for president in 2024. Polls show Trump as the clear Republican favorite, while current President Joe Biden (D) remains deeply unpopular among Democrats and Republicans.

Sabo surfaced earlier this year during the Super Bowl, which was held in L.A.

The artist put up a series of Super Bowl-themed street art posters demanding the recall of L.A. County District Attorney George Gascón (D), whose soft-on-crime platform has resulted in a surge in homicides and other violent crimes in the L.A. area.

“LAPD Cannot Protect You,” one street-art poster reads. “Recall D.A. Gascon.”

Artists using their skill to, so to speak, slay Trump supporters is also nothing new.

One example that immediate comes to mind is actually Jim Carrey and his gruesome and condescending artwork. The Wrap reported:

Jim Carrey has made his disdain for the current state of politics an artform… literally. The Oscar-nominated actor-turned-artist’s series of drawings depict all that he believes to be wrong in D.C., with his biggest gripe going right to the top with President Trump himself.

Here are just a few of his many objets d’art that lay out his discontent for all to see.

So, it’s an increasingly tiresome story of hatred against a group of people on no basis other than their political allegiances. This is being cheerlead by many in the media as well.

In 2018, the now extinct Chris Cuomo publicly encouraged violence against Trump supporters on his show. Later that same year, a CNN analyst, Marc Lamont Hill, all but completely justified violence against Trump supporters.

One would think that Trump leaving office would have alleviated the symptoms of the much-diagnosed Trump Derangement Syndrome. However, it seems that the disease had rather prolonged after effects.

Continue Reading

News

JUSTICE SERVED: Texas Jury REFUSES To Charge Father Who Beats Man To Death Who Raped His Daughter

There will be no charges against a father who beat his daughter’s rapist to death. The Texas rancher beat the accused molester to death after he discovered the man raping his 5-year-old daughter. He will not be charged with homicide, as the 911 tapes released reveal the father calling for help as the other man died.

ABC News reported:

A grand jury Tuesday decided not to indict the 24-year-old father who beat ranch hand, Jesus Mora Flores, to death with his bare hands, after finding the man abusing his daughter behind a barn.

“I need an ambulance. This guy was raping my daughter and I don;t know what to do,” the father is heard telling dispatchers in a frantic call to 911.

The starkly happened on June 9 at an isolated ranch near Shriner, Texas. A witness saw Flores “forcibly carrying” the girl into a secluded area and ran to find the father, according to court documents. Running towards his daughter’s screams, the father found Flores and the girl, both with their underwear removed, according to police reports.

He pulled Flores off the little girl and “inflicted several blows to the man’s head and neck area,” according to documents.

Authorities who examined the girl and Flores’ body confirmed a sexual assault had occurred.

The dad called 911 from a cellphone.

“Come on! This guy is going to die on me! I don’t know what to do,” he yelled at 911 dispatchers.

District Attorney Heather McMinn told reporters, “Under the law in the state of Texas deadly force is authorized and justified in order to stop an aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault.”

“All the evidence provided by the sheriff’s department and the Texas Rangers indicated that’s what was occurring when the victim’s father arrived at the scene,” she said.

The Guardian reported:

A recording of the tape was played during a news conference Tuesday where the Lavaca County district attorney and sheriff announced that the father will not face charges.

In declining to indict the father in the June 9 killing of Jesus Mora Flores, a Lavaca County grand jury reached the same conclusion as investigators and many of the father’s neighbors: he was authorized to use deadly force to protect his daughter.

“It’s sad a man had to die,” said Michael James Veit, 48, who lives across the street from where the attack happened in this small community run on ranching and the Shiner beer brewery “But I think anybody would have done that.”

The family ranch is so remote that on the 911 tape, the father is heard profanely screaming at a dispatcher who couldn’t locate the property. At one point, he tells the dispatcher he’s going to put the man in his truck and drive him to a hospital.

The Associated Press is not identifying the father in order to protect the daughter’s identity. The AP generally does not identify victims of sexual assault. 

Continue Reading

News

PEDOPHILE DEAD: 44-Year-Old Man Accused Of Raping & Killing A 6-Year-Old Child, BURNED Alive By Angry Mob

Disclaimer: This article may contain the personal views and opinions of the author.

A group of people took the law into their own hands after they learned of a man who raped and killed a 6-year-old girl.

Several people in Chiapas, Mexico beat and burned a 44-year-old man alive after he was accused of raping and killing the little girl.

Alfredo Roblero was accused of raping and killing a girl named Jarod, but the police couldn’t come quickly enough. Before local police were able to get involved a few men in the city poured gas on Alfredo and lit him on fire.

It’s been reported that the aunt of the girl was trying to report the murder, but the villagers stopped her and took matters into their own hands.

The Sun reported:

A lynch mob burned a suspected pedophile alive after he was accused of raping and killing a six-year-old girl in a horrible act of jungle justice.

Alfredo Roblero was accused of killing and raping the child, named locally as Jarid.

He was beaten and tied to a big red pole where he sits and is criticized by the mob in the small village near Cacahoatan, southern Mexico.

They then throw him on the grass and kick him in the head before his hands are again tied while he struggles.

Petrol was poured over his body and set alight.

In videos, he can be heard shrieking and screaming while he burns alive.

Jarod, the little girl, was reported missing, then her body was found the next day.

Police arrived too late, unable to save her life.

The authorities in Chiapas said that citizens are not allowed to take matters into their own hands and vowed to open an ongoing investigation into the suspect’s death.

Something similar also happened to two men in India.

They were set on fire by a mob after being accused of raping a minor, according to authorities.

This happened in Jharkhand’s Gumla district in the Basra village. One man died and the other man was left in critical condition.

Newsweek reported:

The deputy superintendent of police in Gumla, Manish Chandra, spoke about the incident, according to a Hindustan Times report.

“As per initial investigation, a girl was dropped at her home by two accused allegedly after raping her,” he said.

“Both the girl and the accused are from different neighborhoods in the same village. Enraged over the allegation of rape, the [girl’s] family members and a few other villagers brought the two boys from home and set them on fire.”

Speaking to the Deccan Herald publication, Chandra gave more details about the incident, saying: “When the girl’s family members and other villagers came to know about the incident, they got hold of the accused. The mob then brought the youths to the survivor’s village, thrashed them and set them on fire.”

The deceased victim has been identified as Sunil Oraon and the alleged rape victim has filed a complaint with the police and has been taken for medical tests, according to the Hindustan Times report.

It never gets any easier hearing and learning about innocent children, whose lives are ruined by disturbed individuals. And in some cases, stolen by them.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 Conservative Talk.

error: Content is protected !!